This version of the protocols has explanation and commentary to aid the reader in understanding the implications.  If you wish to download a complete pdf file without extras then click here.

 

The protocols are the result of a group of people being convinced of its agenda and being practicing Satanists.  They are of course very ill and infected with a virus of the soul that allows them to believe such nonsense.  What ever you may think of it the important thing is that they believe it and are very active in trying to act on its principles.  If you have not read already then please read the secret covenant first, this is a smaller document explaining the ideals and motives of those ‘beings’ that infected weak and ego based humans to write the following protocols.

 

The Secret Covenant can be found here.

 

 

---------------------------------------

Get the "Identity.faq" and many other files by

anonymous FTP from:    ftp.netcom.com /pub/SF/SFA

-------------------------------------------------

 

WORLD CONQUEST

THROUGH WORLD GOVERNMENT

 

The PROTOCOLS

of The LEARNED ELDERS OF ZION

 

 

Translated from the Russian of Sergyei A. Nilus

by  VICTOR E. MARSDEN

 

The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion has become a

best seller among political books published this century.

 

Having been translated into every language since it was

first brought to light in 1919 and having reached over a million

sales in the English edition alone, this remarkable set of docu-

ments is in greater demand than ever today.

 

The years have shown that every great world event has fol-

lowed the course laid down by the secret authors of this book.

Wars, slumps, revolutions, the rise in the cost of living and

chronic unrest are all foretold as leading to the ultimate goal

of World Conquest through the "back-door" means of first estab-

lishing World Government "by consent."

 

The thoughtful reader must reject the view, once held by

some people, that the Protocols originated as an imaginative work

of miraculous accuracy.  The only rational view seems to be that

the Protocols must be taken on their face value as a detailed

plan of action, aiming at nothing other than the goal they them-

selves set forth.  This goal is a World State which the nations

are being urged by their leaders to accept as "the only alterna-

tive to annihilation."  This is the choice which our politicians

are offering us today.

 

The eighty-first impression of the Marsden translation was

presented under the new title World Conquest through World Gov-

ernment because the publishers believed that the ultimate con-

quest foretold in this terrible plan is nearing its final stages.

 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

FAMOUS VIEWS ON THE PROTOCOLS

Introduction

 

Protocol I          The Basic Doctrine

Protocol II         Economic Wars

Protocol III        Methods of Conquest

Protocol IV         Materialism Replace Religion

Protocol V          Despotism and Modern Progress

Protocol VI         Take-Over Technique

Protocol VII        World-Wide Wars

Protocol VIII       Provisional Government

Protocol IX         Re-education

Protocol X          Preparing for Power

Protocol XI         The Totalitarian State

Protocol XII        Control of the Press

Protocol XIII       Distractions

Protocol XIV        Assault on Religion

Protocol XV         Ruthless Suppression

Protocol XVI        Brainwashing

Protocol XVII       Abuse of Authority

Protocol XVIII      Arrest of Opponents

Protocol XIX        Rulers and People

Protocol XX         Financial Programme

Protocol XXI        Loans and Credit

Protocol XXII       Power of Gold

Protocol XXIII      Instilling Obedience

Protocol XXIV       Qualities of the Ruler

 

Epilogue

Appendix

 

 

FAMOUS VIEWS ON THE PROTOCOLS

 

Uncanny Note Of Prophecy

"Whence come this uncanny note of prophecy, prophecy in part

fulfilled, in parts far gone in the way of fulfillment?  Have we

been struggling these tragic years to ... extirpate the secret

organization of German world dominion only to find underneath it,

another, more dangerous because more secret?  Have we ... escaped

a Pax Germanica only to fall into a Pax Judaeica?

 

The Times, London, May 8th, 1920

 

 

Are They A Forgery?

"A document forged to defame a people."

 

The American Hebrew

 

 

"A clumsy forgery."

Lucien Wolf in The Spectator, London, June 12th, 1920

 

 

"Upon that much-vexed subject the authenticity of ...  The

Protocols of Zion we shall not enter, except to say that if the

document is a forgery, as alleged, then it is one of the most

remarkable in the history of literature."

The Spectator, London, October 16th, 1920

 

 

"Those who feel libeled by the Protocols have the most

obvious remedy in the world; all they have to do is to ruse and

denounce the policy of them, instead of denying the

authorship ... But when you come to read them how can any reason-

able man deny the truth of what is contained in them??

Norman Jaques, M.P.,

in Canadian House of Commons, July 9th, 1943

 

 

"On the one hand, the authenticity of this document cannot

be proved; on the other hand, the efforts made by some writers,

principally Jewish, to show it to be a forgery do not carry

conviction to many serious minds."

The Rev. Denny Fahey, C.S.Sp., B.A., D.D., 1939

 

 

Too Terribly Real For Fiction

"Whosoever was the mind that conceived them possessed a

knowledge of human nature, of history, and of statecraft which is

dazzling in its brilliant completeness, and terrible in the

objects to which it turns its power.  It is too terribly real for

fiction, too well sustained for speculation, to deep in its

knowledge of the secret springs of life for forgery."

The Dearborn Independent, July 10th, 1920.

 

 

Confirmation From A Jew

"The United Nations is Zionism.  It is the super government

mentioned many times in the Protocols of the Learned Elders of

Zion, promulgated between 1897 and 1905."

Henry Klein, New York, Jewish Lawyer,

in Zionism Rules the World, 1948.

 

 

They Fit It Now

"The only statement I care to make about the Protocols is

that they fit in with what is going on.  They are sixteen years

old and they have fitted the world situation up to this time.

They fit it now.

Henry Ford in the New York World, February 17th, 1921

 

 

"In the desires of a terrible and formidable sect, you have only

reached the first stages of the plans it has formed for that general Revo-

lution which is to overthrow all thrones, all altars, annihilate all

property, efface all law, and end by dissolving all society."

 

The Abbe Barruel (1797) writing on the Anti-Christian Conspiracy.

**

 

"Unless Bolshevism is nipped in the bud immediately it is bound to

spread in one form or another all over Europe and the whole world, as it is

organized and worked by Jews who have no nationality and whose object is to

destroy for their own ends the existing order of things."

 

British Government White Paper, Russia No. 1 (1919)

 

***

 

"There is now definite evidence that Bolshevism is an international

movement controlled by Jews; communications are passing between the leaders

in America, France,  Russia and England, with a view to concerted action."

 

Directorate of Intelligence, Home Office, Scotland Yard, London,

in a Monthly Report to Foreign Embassies, 16th July, 1919.

 

***

 

"This movement among the Jews is not new. From the days of Spartacus-

Weishaupt to those of Karl Marx, and down to Trotsky (Russia), Bela Kun

(Hungary), Rosa Luxembourg (Germany), and Emma Goldman (United States),

this world-wide conspiracy for the overthrow of civilization and for the

reconstitution [reconstruction] of society on the basis of arrested devel-

opment, of envious malevolence, and impossible equality, has been steadily

growing."

 

Winston Churchill in Illustrated Sunday Herald, 8th February, 1920.

***

 

INTRODUCTION

 

The Protocols of the Learned Elders of ZION may be briefly

described as a blueprint for the domination of the world by a

secret brotherhood.  Whatever may be the truth about their au-

thorship - and, as will be shown, this has been the subject of

bitter dispute - there can be no doubt that the world society to

which they look forward is nothing more or less that a world

police state.

 

The book is which the Protocols were first embodied was

published by Professor Sergyei A. Nilus in Russia in 1905, a

copy being received in the British Museum on August 10th,

1906, Professor Nilus's concern was to expose that he be-

lieved to be a ruthless, cold-blooded conspiracy for the

destruction of Christian CIVILIZATION.  Early, in August and

September of 1903, the Russian newspaper SNAMIA had pub-

lished the Protocols, and they are also believed to have

been published in the winter of 1902/1903 in the newspaper

MOSKOWSKIJA WIEDOMOSTI.  They remained unknown outside

Russia, however, until after the Bolshevik Revolution, when

Russian emigrants brought Nilus's book to North America and

Germany.

 

The similarity between what was forecast in the Protocols

and the fate which had befallen Russia under the Bolsheviks was

so marked that, after these long years of neglect, they rapidly

became one of the most famous (or notorious) documents in the

world.

 

In Bolshevik Russia, the penalty for their mere possession

was death.  It remains so to this day, both in the Soviet Union

and in the Satellite countries.  Outside the Iron Curtain, in

South Africa possession of the Protocols is also forbidden by

law, although the penalty is less drastic.

 

As a result of their rapidly growing fame, numerous attempts

were made to discredit the Protocols as a forgery.  But it was

not until 1933 that the JEWS resorted to legal action.  On 26th

June, 1933, the FEDERATION of JEWISH COMMUNITY brought an action

against five members of the Swiss National Front, seeking a

judgment that the Protocols were a forgery and a prohibition of

their publication.  The procedure of the Court was astounding,

the provisions of the Swiss Civil Code being deliberately set

aside.  Sixteen witnesses called by the plaintiffs were heard,

but only one of the forty witnesses called by the defendants was

allowed a hearing.  The judge allowed the plaintiffs to appoint

two private stenographers to keep the register of proceedings

during the hearing of their witnesses, instead of entrusting the

task to a Court official.

 

In view of these and similar irregularities, it was not

surprising that, after the case had lasted just on two years, the

Court pronounced the Protocols to be a forgery and demoralizing

literature.  The decision was given on 14th May, 1935, but it was

announced in the JEWISH PRESS before it was delivered by the

Court!

 

On 1st November, 1937, the Swiss Court of Criminal Appeal

quashed this judgment in its entirety.  JEWISH PROPAGANDISTS,

however, still declare that the Protocols have been "proved" to

be a forgery.

 

It is natural that the JEWS should try to discredit the

Protocols, for their growing fame was focusing more public atten-

tion on other revealing utterances.

 

In Disraeli's THE LIFE OF LORD GEORGE BENTINCK, written in

1852, there occurs this quotation: -

 

"The influence of the JEWS may be traced in the last

outbreak of the destructive principle in Europe.  An insurrection

takes place against tradition and aristocracy, against religion

and property.  Destruction of the Semitic principles, extirpation

of the JEWISH RELIGION, whether in the Mosaic or the CHRISTIAN

form the natural equality of men and the abrogation of property

are proclaimed by the Secret Societies which form Provisional

Governments and men of the JEWISH RACE are found at the head of

every one of them.  The people of God cooperate with atheists;

the most skillful accumulators of property ally themselves with

Communists; the peculiar and chosen Race touch the hand of all

the scum and low castes of Europe; and all this because they wish

to destroy that ungrateful Christendom which owes to them its

name, and whose tyranny they can no longer endure."

 

Max Norday, a JEW, speaking at the ZIONIST CONGRESS at Basel

in  August 1903, made this astonishing "prophecy":

 

"Let me tell you the following words as if I  were

shoeing you the rungs of a ladder leading upward and upward:

Herzl, the ZIONIST CONGRESS, the English Uganda proposition,

the future world war, the peace conference, where with the

help of England a free and JEWISH PALESTINE will be  creat-

ed."

 

Walter Rathenau, the JEWISH BANKER behind the Kaiser, writ-

ing in the German WIENER FREIE PRESSE, December 24, 1912, said:

 

"Three hundred men, each of who knows all the others,

govern the fate of the European continent, and they elect

their successor from their entourage."

 

Confirmation of Rathenau's statement came twenty years later

in 1931 when Jean Izoulet, a prominent member of the JEWISH

ALLIANCE ISRAELITE UNIVERSELLE, wrote in his PARIS LA CAPITALAE

DES RELIGIONS:

 

"The meaning of the history of the last century is that

today 300 JEWISH FINANCIER, all Masters of Lodges, rule the

world."

 

The LONDON JEWISH CHRONICLE, on April 4th, 1919, declared:

 

"There is much in the fact of Bolshevism itself, in the

fact that so many JEWS are BOLSHEVISTS, in the fact that the

ideals of Bolshevism at many points are consonant with the

finest ideals of Judaism."

 

and on March 15th, 1923, the JEWISH WORLD asserted:

 

"Fundamentally JUDAISM is ANTI-CHRISTIAN."

 

These and many similar assertions from JEWISH sources were

damaging enough  from the JEWISH point of view.  Taken in con-

junction with the Protocols, with which more and more people were

becoming familiar, they were damning.

 

The attitude of many people whose concern over the growing

attack on CHRISTIAN CIVILIZATION was rapidly increasing was

summed up by the late Henry Ford senior, the founder of the

world-famous motor manufacturing company.  In an interview pub-

lished in the New York World on February 17th, 1921, Mr.  Ford

declared:

 

"The only statement I care to make about the Protocols

is that they fit in with what is going on.  They are sixteen

years old, and have fitted the world situation up to this

time.  THEY FIT IT NOW."

 

Those who, like Henry Ford, could see that "they fit it now"

only sixteen years after Nilus's first publication of the Proto-

cols, naturally tended to concentrate their attention on the

relatively recent phenomenon of Bolshevism.  Few of them the

understood the equally dangerous, if more insidious, danger of

internationalism.

 

Now, however, more than half a century after Nilus's publi-

cation of the Protocols, the reality of that danger must be

crystal clear to anybody who views the world situation objectively.

 

The Protocols are full of references to a "Super-

Government," PROTOCOL VI, for example, states:

 

"In every possible way we must develop the significance

of our Super-Government by representing it as the Protector

and Benefactor of all those who voluntarily submit to us."

 

That is exactly the way in which the United Nations special

agencies - UNESCO (U.N.  Educational, Scientific and Cultural

Organization); ILO (International Labour Organization); WHO

(World Health Organization); FAO (Food and Agriculture Organiza-

tion); Commission of Human Rights; Genocide Convention, etc.  -

are represented.

 

For some years there has been in existence an international

organization calling itself the World Association of Parliamen-

tarians for World Government, which pursues the same objective as

that of another long-established international organization,

Federal Union.  This body does not disuse the fact that the

United Nations, by means of a few relatively minor changes in its

Charter, could be transformed virtually over night into a World

Government.

 

There has long been agitation for the creation of a World

Police Force.  This would enable the United Nations Super-Govern-

ment to function as a master of an all-powerful World Police

State, and the closing years of the 1950's have seen the agita-

tors for a World Police Force come close to achieving their

objective.  The U.N.  Emergency Force, established after the Suez

crisis of 1956, has been openly regarded as a "pilot scheme."

 

Should the few changes in the Charter necessary to transform

the U.N.  into a Super-Government be made, it will have in the

special agencies ready made Ministries of Education (or Propagan-

da), Labor, Health, Food and Agriculture, "Justice", etc.

 

Can it be an accident that these things are so accurately

for-shadowed in the Protocols?

 

The full-scale World Super-Government is not the only, nor

perhaps the most immediate, danger.  It is obvious to everyone

that the nations of the East are being herded into subjection

under the dominance of the Soviet Union.  But what of the nations

of the West? Are they really the "free nations" which they are

popularly supposed to be?

 

Far from it! They are being herded into that same sort of

pen as are the nations of the East under Communism.  Late in

1957, the process had gone for enough to be given an official

name.  That name was the policy of inter-dependence."

 

The nations of the West are being brought under internation-

al control at political, military and economic levels.  They are

rapidly in process of becoming controlled also on the social

level.  All alike are being told that their only hope lies in the

surrender of national sovereignty.

 

National Parliaments must give way to such bodies as the

Council of Europe or the Atlantic Council.  National Forces must

be submerged in such bodies as the North Atlantic Treaty Organi-

zation (NATO), the Baghdad Pact or the South-East Treaty Organi-

zation (SEATO), so that no nation has control over its own means

of defense.  National economies must be submerged in such bodies

as the Organization for European Economic Cooperation (OEEC), the

European Payments Union (EPU) or the World Bank, so that no

nation may control its own economic destiny.

 

Even on the social level, individual national distinctions

must disappear.  For example, under the "Common Market" Treaty

which unites six European nations on the economic plane, provi-

sion is made for the "equalization of social policies."  And

strenuous efforts have been made to herd other European nations,

Great Britain among them, into this same pen in the associated

European Free Trade Area.

 

In 1934, when the leader of the British Labor Party (Mr.

Clement Attlee) told the party's annual conference:

 

"We are deliberately putting loyalty to a world order

above loyalty to our own country," he was widely execrated.

 

Twenty-three years of propaganda, however, leave their mark,

and when, in 1957, a Conservative Prime Minister of Britain told

the British people that they must surrender some of their nation-

al sovereignty to an unknown international cabal, scarcely a

voice was raise in protest.  At the close of 1957 there was an

official declaration of the British Government's support for the

plan which was foreshadowed in the Protocols over sixty years

ago.  The Earl of Gosford, Joint Under-Secretary of State for

Foreign Affairs, said in the House of Lords on 7th November,

1957:

 

"Her Majesty's Government are fully in agreement with

World Government.  We agree that this must be the goal, and

that every step that is humanly possible must be taken to

reach that goal."

 

All over the world "federation", "integration", "regionali-

zation" and "inter-dependence" are the order of the day.  All

this is foreshadowed in the Protocols, published more than

half-a-century ago by Sergyei Nilus, which, we are told are

forgery.

 

Can this be coincidence? Could any forger be so prescient?

 

Or are the Protocols what Nilus and many others believed

them to be - the blueprint for a conspiracy to destroy CHRISTIAN

CIVILIZATION and place the whole world under the domination of a

small, secret cabal?

 

 

NOTES

 

I - "AGENTURE" and "THE POLITICAL"

 

There are two words in this translation which are unusual,

the words "Agentur" and "political" used as substantives.

"Agentur" appears to be adopted from the original test and it

means the whole body of agents and agencies directed by the

Elders, whether members of the tribe or their GENTILE tools.

 

By "the Political" is meant not exactly the "body politic"

but the entire machinery of politics.

 

 

II - The Symbolic Snake of Judaism

 

Chapter III opens with a reference to the symbolic Snake of

Judaism.  In his Epilogue to the 1905 Edition of the Protocols

Nilus gives the following interesting account of this symbol:

 

According to the records of secret JEWISH ZIONISM, Solomon

and other JEWISH learned men had already, in 929 B.C., thought

out a theoretical scheme for the peaceful conquest of the whole

universe by ZION.

 

As history developed, this scheme was worked out in detail

and completed by men who were subsequently initiated in this

question.  The learned men decided by peaceful means to conquer

the world for ZION with the slyness of the Symbolic Snake, whose

head was to represent those who have been initiated into the

plans of the JEWISH PEOPLE - the administration was always kept

secret, even from the JEWISH NATION itself.  As this Snake pene-

trated into the hearts of the nations which it encountered it

undermined and devoured all the NON-JEWISH power of these States.

It is foretold that the Snake has sill to finish its work,

strictly adhering to the designed plan, until the course which it

has to run is closed by the return of its head to ZION and until,

by this means, the Snake has completed its round of Europe and

has encircled it - and until, by dint of enchaining Europe, it

has encompassed the whole world.  This it is to accomplish by

using every endeavor to subdue the other countries by an economic

conquest.

 

The return of the head of the Snake to ZION can only be

accomplished after the power of all the Sovereigns of Europe has

been laid low, that is to say, when by means of economic crises

and wholesale destruction effected everywhere, there shall have

been brought about a spiritual demoralization and a moral corrup-

tion, chiefly with the assistance of JEWISH WOMEN masquerading as

French, Italians, etc.  These are the surest spreader of licen-

tiousness into the lives of the leading men at the heads of

nations.

 

A map of the course of the Symbolic Snake is shown as fol-

lows: Its first stage in Europe was in 429 B.C.  in Greece,

where, about the time of Pericles, the Snake first started eating

into the power of that country.  The second stage was in Rome in

the time of Augustus, about 69 B.C.  The third in Madrid in the

times of Charles V, in A.D.  1552.  The fourth in Paris about

1790, in the time of Louis XVI.  The fifth in London from 1814

onwards (after the downfall of Napoleon).  The sixth in Berlin in

1871 after the Franco-Prussian war.  The seventh in St.  Peters-

burg, over which is drawn the head of the Snake under the date

1881.

 

After these states which the Snake traversed have had the

foundations of their constitutions shaken, Germany, with its

apparent power, forming no exception to the rule.  In economic

conditions England and Germany are spared by the Snake, on which

at present [i.e., 1905] all its efforts are concentrated.  The

future course of the Snake is not shown on this map, but arrows

indicate its next movement towards Moscow, Kiev, and Odessa.

 

It is now well know to us to what extent the latter cities

form the centers of the militant JEWISH RACE.  Constantinople is

shown as the last of the Snake's course before it reaches Jerusa-

lem.

 

III - The term "Goyim"

 

Meaning GENTILES or NON-JEW, is used throughout the Proto-

cols and is retained by Mr. Marsden.

 

 

The Protocols

-------------

 

In 1884 the daughter of a Russian general, Mlle. Justine

Glinka, was endeavoring to serve her country in Paris by

obtaining political information, which she communicated to

General Orgevskii in St. Petersburg. For this purpose she

employed a Jew, Joseph Schorst, member of the Mizraim Lodge in

Paris. One day Schorst offered to obtain for her a document of

great importance to Russia, on payment of 2,500 francs. This sum

being received from St. Petersburg was paid over and the document

handed to Mlle. Glinka.

She forwarded the French original, accompanied by a Russian

translation, to Orgevskii, who in turn handed it to his chief,

General Cherevin, for transmission to the Tsar. But Cherevin,

under obligation to wealthy Jews, refused to transmit it, merely

filing it in the archives.

Meantime there appeared in Paris certain books on Russian

court life which displeased the Tsar, who ordered his secret

police to discover their authorship. This was falsefy attributed,

perhaps with malicious intent, to Mlle. Glinka, and on her return

to Russia she was banished to her estate in Orel. To the marechal

de noblesse of this district, Alexis Sukhotin, Mlle. Glinka gave

a copy of the Protocols. Sukhotin showed the document to two

friends, Stepanov and Nilus; the former had it printed and

circulated privately in 1897; the second, Professor Sergius A.

Nilus, published it for the first time in Tsarskoe-Tselc (Russia)

in 1901, in a book entitled The Great Within the Small. Then,

about the same time, a friend of Nilus, G. Butmi, also brought it

out and a copy was deposited in the British Museum on August 10,

1906.

Meantime, through Jewish members of the Russian police,

minutes of the proceedings of the Basle congress in 1897 had been

obtained and these were found to correspond with the Protocols.

In January 1917, Nilus had prepared a second edition,

revised and documented, for publication. But before it could be

put on the market, the revolution of March 1917 had taken place

and Kerenski, who had succeded to power, ordered the whole

edition of Nilus's book to be destroyed. In 1924, Prof. Nilus was

arrested by the Cheka in Kiev, imprisoned, and tortured; he was

told by the Jewish president of the court, that this treatment

was meted out to him for "having done them incalculable harm in

publishing the Protocols". Released for a few months, he was

again led before the G.P.U. (Cheka), this time in Moscow and

confined. Set at liberty in February 1926, he died in exile in

the district of Vladimir on January 13, 1929.]

 

[This is a Russian edition by Sergius A. Nilus in 1905]

 

[Translated from the Russian Text by Victor E. Marsden --

Formerly Russian Correspondent of "The Morning Post"]

 

 

PROTOCOLS

OF THE MEETINGS OF THE

LEARNED ELDERS OF ZION

----------

 

PROTOCOL NO. 1

 

Right lies in Might. Freedom -- an idea only. Liberalism.

Gold. Faith. Self-Government. Despotism of Capital. The

internal foe. The Mob. Anarchy. Politics versus Morals. The

Right of the strong. The Invincibility of Jew-Masonic

authority. End justifies Means. The Mob a Blind Man.

Political A.B.C. Party Discord. Most satisfactory form of

rule-Despotism. Alcohol. Classicism. Corruption. Principles

and rules of the Jew-Masonic Government. Terror. ''Liberty,

Equality, Fraternity.'' Principle of Dynastic Rule.

Annihilation of the privileges of the Goy-Aristocracy (i.e.,

non-Jew). The New Aristocracy. The psychological

calculation. Abstractness of "Liberty." Power of removal of

representatives of the people.

 

.....Putting aside fine phrases we shall speak of the

significance of each thought: by comparisons and deductions we

shall throw light upon surrounding facts.

What I am about to set forth, then, is our system

from the two point[s] of view, that of ourselves and that of

the goyim (i.e., non-Jews).

It must be noted that men with bad instincts are more

in number than the good, and therefore the best results in

governing them are attained by violence and terrorization, and

not by academic discussions. Every man aims at power, everyone

would like to become a dictator if only he could, and rare indeed

are the men who would not be willing to sacrifice the welfare of

all for the sake of securing their own welfare.

What has restrained the beasts of prey who are called men?

What has served for their guidance hitherto?

In the beginnings of the structure of society they were

subjected to brutal and blind force; afterwards -- to Law, which

is the same force, only disguised. I draw the conclusion that by

the law of nature right lies in force.

Political freedom is an idea but not a fact. This idea one

must know how to apply whenever it appears necessary with this

bait of an idea to attract the masses of the people to one's

party for the purpose of crushing another who is in authority.

This task is rendered easier if the opponent has himself been

infected with the idea of freedom, so-called liberalism, and, for

the sake of an idea, is willing to yield some of his power. It is

precisely here that the triumph of our theory appears: the

slackened reins of government are immediately, by the law of

life, caught up and gathered together by a new hand, because the

blind might of the nation cannot for one single day exist without

guidance, and the new authority merely fits into the place of the

old already weakened by liberalism.

In our day the power which has replaced that of the rulers

who were liberal is the power of Gold. Time was when Faith ruled.

The idea of freedom is impossible of realization because no one

knows how to use it with moderation. It is enough to hand over a

people to self-government for a certain length of time for that

people to be turned into a disorganized mob. From that moment on

we get internecine strife which soon develops into battles

between classes, in the midst of which States burn down and their

importance is reduced to that of a heap of ashes.

Whether a State exhausts itself in its own convulsions,

whether its internal discord brings it under the power of

external foes -- in any case it can be accounted irretrievably

lost: it is in our power. The despotism of Capital, which is

entirely in our hands, reaches out to it a straw that the State,

willy-nilly, must take hold of: if not -- it goes to the bottom.

Should anyone of a liberal mind say that such reflections as

the above are immoral I would put the following questions: -- If

every State has two foes and if in regard to the external foe it

is allowed and not considered immoral to use every manner and art

of conflict, as for example to keep the enemy in ignorance of

plans of attack and defence, to attack him by night or in

superior numbers, then in what way can the same means in regard

to a worse foe, the destroyer of the structure of society and the

commonweal, be called immoral and not permissible?

Is it possible for any sound logical mind to hope with any

success to guide crowds by the aid of reasonable counsels and

arguments, when any objection or contradiction, senseless though

it may be, can be made and when such objection may find more

favour with the people, whose powers of reasoning are

superficial? Men in masses and the men of the masses, being

guided solely by petty passions, paltry beliefs, customs,

traditions and sentimental theorism, fall a prey to party

dissension, which hinders any kind of agreement even on the basis

of a perfectly reasonable argument. Every resolution of a crowd

depends upon a chance or packed majority, which, in its ignorance

of political secrets, put forth some ridiculous resolution that

lays in the administration a seed of anarchy.

The political has nothing in common with the moral. The

ruler who is governed by the moral is not a skilled politician,

and is therefore unstable on his throne. He who wishes to rule

must have recource both to cunning and to make-believe. Great

national qualities, like frankness and honesty, are vices in

politics, for they bring down rulers from their thrones more

effectively and more certainly than the most powerful enemy. Such

qualities must be the attributes of the kingdoms of the goyim,

but we must in no wise be guided by them.

Our right lies in force. The word "right" is an abstract

thought and proved by nothing. The word means no more than: --

Give me what I want in order that thereby I may have a proof that

I am stronger than you.

Where does right begin? Where does it end?

In any State in which there is a bad organization of

authority, an impersonality of laws and of the rulers who have

lost their personality amid the flood of rights ever multiplying

out of liberalism, I find a new right -- to attack by the right

of the strong, and to scatter to the winds all existing forces of

order and regulation, to reconstruct all institutions and to

become the sovereign lord of those who have left to us the rights

of their power by laying them down voluntarily in their

liberalism.

Our power in the present tottering condition of all forms of

power will be more invisible than any other, because it will

remain invisible until the moment when it has gained such

strength that no cunning can any longer undermine it.

Out of the temporary evil we are now compelled to commit

will emerge the good of an unshakeable rule, which will restore

the regular course of the machinery of the national life, brought

to naught by liberalism. The result justifies the means. Let us,

however, in our plans, direct our attention not so much to what

is good and moral as to what is necessary and useful.

Before us is a plan in which is laid down strategically the

line from which we cannot deviate without running the risk of

seeing the labour of many centuries brought to naught.

In order to elaborate satisfactory forms of action it is

necessary to have regard to the rascality, the slackness, the

instability of the mob, its lack of capacity to understand and

respect the conditions of its own life, or its own welfare. It

must be understood that the might of a mob is blind, senseless

and unreasoning force ever at the mercy of a suggestion from any

side. The blind cannot lead the blind without bringing them into

the abyss; consequently, members of the mob, upstarts from the

people even though they should be as a genius for wisdom, yet

having no understanding of the political, cannot come forward as

leaders of the mob without bringing the whole nation to ruin.

Only one trained from childhood for independent rule can

have understanding of the words that can be made up of the

political alphabet.

A people left to itself i.e., to upstarts from its midst,

brings itself to ruin by party dissensions excited by the pursuit

of power and honours and the disorders arising therefrom, Is it

possible for the masses of the people calmly and without petty

jealousies to form judgments, to deal with the affairs of the

country, which cannot be mixed up with personal interests? Can

they defend themselves from an external foe? It is unthinkable,

for a plan broken up into as many parts as there are heads in the

mob, loses all homogeneity, and thereby becomes unintelligible

and impossible of execution.

It is only with a despotic ruler that plans can be

elaborated extensively and clearly in such a way as to distribute

the whole properly among the several parts of the machinery of

the State: from this the conclusion is inevitable that a

satisfactory form of government for any country is one that

concentrates in the hands of one responsible person. Without an

absolute despotism there can be no existence for civilization

which is carried on not by the masses but by their guide,

whosoever that person may be. The mob is a savage and displays

its savagery at every opportunity. The moment the mob seizes

freedom in its hands it quickly turns to anarchy, which in itself

is the highest degree of savagery.

Behold the alcoholized animals, bemused with drink, the

right to an immoderate use of which comes along with freedom. It

is not for us and ours to walk that road. The peoples of the

goyim are bemused with alcoholic liquors; their youth has grown

stupid on classicism and from early immorality, into which it has

been inducted by our special agents -- by tutors, lackeys,

governesses in the houses of the wealthy, by clerks and others,

by our women in the places of dissipation frequented by the

goyim. In the number of these last I count also the so-called

"society ladies," voluntary followers of the others in corruption

and luxury.

Our countersign is -- Force and Make-believe. Only force

conquers in political affairs, especially if it be concealed in

the talents essential to statesmen. Violence must be the

principle, and cunning and make-believe the rule for governments

which do not want to lay down their crowns at the feet of agents

of some new power. This evil is the one and only means to attain

the end, the good. Therefore we must not stop at bribery, deceit

and treachery when they should serve towards the attainment of

our end. In politics one must know how to seize the property of

others without hesitation if by it we secure submission and

sovereignty.

Our State, marching along the path of peaceful conquest, has

the right to replace the horrors of war by less noticeable and

more satisfactory sentences of death, necessary to maintain the

terror which tends to produce blind submission. Just but

merciless severity is the greatest factor of strength in the

State: not only for the sake of gain but also in the name of

duty, for the sake of victory, we must keep to the programme of

violence and make-believe. The doctrine of squaring accounts is

precisely as strong as the means of which it makes use. Therefore

it is not so much by the means themselves as by the doctrine of

severity that we shall triumph and bring all governments into

subjection to our super-government. It is enough for them to know

that we are merciless for all disobedience to cease.

Far back in ancient times we were the first to cry among the

masses of the people the words "Liberty, Equality, Fraternity,"

words many times repeated since those days by stupid poll-parrots

who from all sides round flew down upon these baits and with them

carried away the well-being of the world, true freedom of the

individual, formerly so well guarded against the pressure of the

mob. The would-be wise men of the goyim, the intellectuals, could

not make anything out of the uttered words in their abstractness;

did not note the contradiction of their meaning and inter-

relation: did not see that in nature there is no equality, cannot

be freedom; that Nature herself has established inequality of

minds, of characters, and capacities, just as immutably as she

has established subordination to her laws: never stopped to think

that the mob is a blind thing, that upstarts elected from among

it to bear rule are, in regard to the political, the same blind

men as the mob itself, that the adept, though he be a fool, can

yet rule, whereas the non-adept, even if he were a genius,

understands nothing in the political -- to all these things the

goyim paid no regard; yet all the time it was based upon these

things that dynastic rule rested: the father passed on to the son

a knowledge of the course of political affairs in such wise that

none should know it but members of the dynasty and none could

betray it to the governed. As time went on the meaning of the

dynastic transference of the true position of affairs in the

political was lost, and this aided the success of our cause.

In all corners of the earth the words "Liberty, Equality,

Fraternity" brought to our ranks, thanks to our blind agents,

whole legions who bore our banners with enthusiasm. And all the

time these words were canker-worms at work boring into the well-

being of the goyim, putting an end everywhere to peace, quiet,

solidarity and destroying all the foundations of the goya States.

As you will see later, this helped us to our triumph; it gave us

the possibility, among other things, of getting into our hands

the master card -- the destruction of the privileges, or in other

words of the very existence of the aristocracy of the goyim, that

class which was the only defense peoples and countries had

against us. On the ruins of the natural and genealogical

aristocracy of the goyim we have set up the aristocracy of our

educated class headed by the aristocracy of money. The

qualifications for this aristocracy we have established in

wealth, which is dependent upon us, and in knowledge, for which

our learned elders provide the motive force.

Our triumph has been rendered easier by the fact that in our

relations with the men whom we wanted we have always worked upon

the most sensitive chords of the human mind, upon the cash

account, upon the cupidity, upon the insatiability for material

needs of man: and each one of these human weaknesses, taken

alone, is sufficient to paralyse initiative, for it hands over

the will of men to the disposition of him who has bought their

activities.

The abstraction of freedom has enabled us to persuade the

mob in all countries that their government is nothing but the

steward of the people who are the owners of the country, and that

the steward may be replaced like a worn-out glove.

It is this possibility of replacing the representatives of

the people which has placed them at our disposal, and, as it

were, given us the power of appointment.

 

 

PROTOCOL NO. 2

 

Economic Wars--the foundation of the Jewish predominance.

Figure-head government and "secret advisers." Successes of

destructive doctrines. Adaptability in politics. Part played

by the Press. Cost of gold and value of Jewish sacrifice.

 

It is indispensable for our purpose that wars, so far as

possible, should not result in territorial gains: war will thus

be brought on to the economic ground, where the nations will not

fail to perceive in the assistance we give the strength of our

predominance, and this state of things will put both sides at the

mercy of our international agentur; which possesses millions of

eyes ever on the watch and unhampered my any limitations

whatsoever. Our international rights will then wipe out national

rights, in the proper sense of right, and will rule the nations

precisely as the civil law of States rules the relations of their

subjects among themselves.

The administrators, whom we shall choose from among the

public, with strict regard to their capacities for servile

obedience, will not be persons trained in the arts of government,

and will therefore easily become pawns in our game in the hands

of men of learning and genius who will be their advisers,

specialists bred and reared from early childhood to rule the

affairs of the whole world. As is well known to you, these

specialists of ours have been drawing to fit them for rule the

information they need from our political plans from the lessons

of history, from observations made of the events of every moment

as it passes. The goyim are not guided by practical use of

unprejudiced historical observation, but by theoretical routine

without any critical regard for consequent results. We need not,

therefore, take any account of them -- let them amuse themselves

until the hour strikes, or live on hopes of new forms of

enterprising pastime, or on the memories of all they have

enjoyed. For them let that play the principal part which we have

persuaded them to accept as the dictates of science (theory). It

is with this object in view that we are constantly, by means of

our press, arousing a blind confidence in these theories. The

intellectuals of the goyim will puff themselves up with their

knowledge and without any logical verification of them will put

into effect all the information available from science, which our

agentur specialists have cunningly pieced together for the

purpose of educating their minds in the direction we want.

Do not suppose for a moment that these statements are empty

words: think carefully of the successes we arranged for

Darwinism, Marxism, Nietzscheism. To us Jews, at any rate, it

should be plain to see what a disintegrating importance these

directives have had upon the minds of the goyim.

It is indispensable for us to take account of the thoughts,

characters, tendencies of the nations in order to avoid making

slips in the political and in the direction of administrative

affairs. The triumph of our system, of which the component parts

of the machinery may be variously disposed according to the

temperament of the peoples met on our way, will fail of success

if the practical application of it be not based upon a summing up

of the lessons of the past in the light of the present.

In the hands of the States of to-day there is a great force

that creates the movement of thought in the people, and that is

the Press. The part played by the Press is to keep pointing out

requirements supposed to be indispensable, to give voice to the

complaints of the people, to express and create discontent. It is

in the Press that the triumph of freedom of speech finds its

incarnation. But the goyim States have not known how to make use

of this force; and it has fallen into our hands. Through the

Press we have gained the power to influence while remaining

ourselves in the shade: thanks to the Press we have got the

gold in our hands, notwithstanding that we have had to gather

it out of the oceans of blood and tears. But it has paid us,

though we have sacrificed many of our people. Each victim on

our side is worth in the sight of God a thousand goyim.

 

 

PROTOCOL NO. 3

 

The Symbolic Snake and its significance. The instability of

the constitutional scales. Terror in the palaces. Power and

ambition. Parliaments "talkeries," pamphlets. Abuse of

power. Economic slavery. "People's Rights." Monopolist

system and the aristocracy. The Army of Mason-Jewry.

Decrescence of the Goyim. Hunger and rights of capital. The

mob and the coronation of "The Sovereign Lord of all the

World." The fundamental precept in the programme of the

future Masonic national schools. The secret of the science